The work crosses departments
Sales starts it, operations continues it, finance closes it — in three systems.
Solution · Engineering
For processes that cross departments and systems, where the work does not fit any standard product — built as software, phased, and scoped before anything is committed.
The problem
Sales starts it, operations continues it, finance closes it — in three systems.
Built up over years, held by experienced staff, written down nowhere complete.
So the gaps are filled by people, spreadsheets and re-keying.
Starting scope
Full working functionality for the agreed workflow — not an artificially limited demo. The workflow itself is agreed with you before the trial starts.
What the system does
Where a workflow spans several departments, multiple agents can coordinate, each with its own scope and permissions, and a defined handover between them.
Before and after
Example workflow
Illustrative workflow · configuration varies by project
Integrations
Feasibility depends on access rather than ambition. The first question in scoping is always what each system can actually expose, and what it cannot.
Integration feasibility is confirmed during scoping.
Human control
In a multi-agent system the question is not whether humans stay in control, but exactly where. That map is produced during design and agreed before build.
Example implementations
One system with local variations, instead of several incompatible habits.
Approval flows and logging designed into the workflow from the start.
Automation built around systems that cannot realistically be replaced.
Questions
We do not quote the whole programme up front. For complex multi-agent programmes, deeper discovery is agreed as part of scoping to establish system access, dependencies and sequencing. Delivery is phased so each phase is approved on its own merits. Where possible, the first phase is deliberately kept small to validate the approach before expansion.
Project ownership, infrastructure accounts and handover arrangements are defined transparently before implementation begins. Our preferred approach is to avoid unnecessary vendor lock-in and to make infrastructure ownership clear from the start.
Deployment options include your own cloud, an isolated environment or on-premise where technically appropriate. The choice is driven by data sensitivity and your infrastructure policy, and is agreed during design.
Where a narrow slice of the wider process can run on its own, it can be trialled live for 3 days first. Larger programmes are scoped with you directly.